My Bounty

Go to My Boutnty

Oops! You don't appear to be logged in!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Partners

Second-hand tobacco smoke linked to kids' allergies

18 Dec 2007

Second-hand tobacco smoke linked to kids
Infants who are exposed to passive cigarette smoke have a higher risk of developing allergies, new research suggests.

Results of a parental survey published ahead of print in the journal Thorax found that children whose parents smoked around them in early childhood were almost twice as likely to be allergic to inhaled allergens as babies who weren't exposed to second-hand smoke.

The survey questioned 4,000 families about their children's allergies and the environmental factors they were exposed to both before and after birth.

In addition, infants who inhaled passive smoke were 50% more likely to have a food allergy.

However, no evidence was found to suggest that smoking while pregnant affected a child's risk of becoming 'sensitised' to certain allergens.

Scientific studies have linked maternal smoking to a wide range of pregnancy complications, including low birth weight and premature labour.

Recent research also discovered that mothers who smoke before, during and after pregnancy could be putting their child's fertility levels at risk.

Discuss this item in our forums


Bookmark and Share Like this? Subscribe to RSS feed!



  Related news
Myleene reveals baby hopes »
Golfer Justin Rose to become a father »
Naomi hopes age won't stop her having more babies »
Smoking in pregnancy linked to cot death risk  »
Jools Oliver admits hopes for another daughter  »
All news »

Advertisement

Weekly poll

In a speech at the recent Conservative party conference it was proposed that 'all mothers in (NHS) maternity care will have access to a single room'. How do you feel about this idea? (Please select one answer only)
It's a great idea and would get my vote! 
It's a good idea, but not a priority 
Sharing a postnatal ward is safer if anything were to happen to you or your baby 
Money should be spent on more midwives instead 
It's unrealistic and would be a waste of money