My Bounty

Go

Oops! You don't appear to be logged in!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Our partners

Study links baby products to chemical exposure

04 Feb 2008

Study links baby products to chemical exposure
Babies may be regularly exposed to potentially harmful chemicals found in baby shampoos, lotions and powders, a new study suggests.

Research carried out in the US has found that elevated levels of phthalate chemicals were present in the urine of babies who had come into recent contact with baby cosmetic products.

The highest levels of the chemicals were found to be most prevalent in babies under the age of eight months.

Although further study is required to decipher the potential dangers of exposure to phthalates, the findings have raised concerns among environmental groups.

The study's lead author, Dr Sheela Sathyanarayana, a pediatrician at the University of Washington, said: "The bottom line is that these chemicals likely do exist in products that we're commonly using on our children and they potentially could cause health effects."

Previous studies on animals have linked phthalates to reproductive, developmental defects.

She recommended that water alone or small amounts of shampoo should be sufficient for babies' hair.

Discuss this item in our forums


Bookmark and Share Like this? Subscribe to RSS feed!



  Related news
Link made between Caesarean and asthma  »
Breast milk 'banks' could be established  »
Zucker wants a baby 'right away' »
Baby Bronx's first pics expected to fetch $2m »
Heels for babies hit the UK  »
All news »

Advertisement

Weekly poll

With the festive season almost upon us, we'd like to know what best describes your attitude towards spending this Christmas? (Please select one option only)
Christmas is a special time of year, and we'll spend the same as always 
We'll probably spend as we usually do and worry about it in the new year 
We're not worried about spending, as we have saved in advance / have been spreading the cost 
We've got to be more careful this year, but the kid(s) won’t lose out 
We'll be cutting back this year